I'm boggled and perplexed. Millions of Americans believe that the election of Donald is the fulfillment of God's will.
God wants Vladimir Putin to be perfect.
People pray that God will guide a surgeon's hands.
Is there any line of demarcation? Perhaps not.
Let me go back to the Great Orange One (Trump, not God). Is God putting stupid words into Trump's mouth? Was this, too, prophesied?
Was it God's plan to have toilet paper stick to Trump's shoe as he boarded Air Force One? It must have been.
Et tu, Corinthians?
Truly, these are strange and mysterious ways.
Friday, August 23, 2019
Wednesday, July 10, 2019
Polaroid SX-70 Shots
Previously, I mentioned that I got an old circa '75 vintage Polaroid SX-70. I've taken a few shot with it, and I wish I could be more impressed. I was hoping for more bright colors, but as you can see, this isn't Kodachrome. This is what you get with Polaroids.
This is the first shot that I took, which I had posted previously via iPhone capture. The car is silver and the siding of the house should be like a light chocolate milk color. You can notice one good thing, however, there is very little lens distortionin the front and back lines of the house in the background.
This is Morgantown shot from the sixth floor of One Waterfront Place. Despite the cloud cover, I thought that it should have been an adequately bright day for this landscape shot.
I'd held out the most hope for this last picture of some yellow lilies growing in a flower bed alongside of One Waterfront Place. This was taken in very bright sunlight. So bright, that the flower petals are almost over exposed. Orange day lilies in the background are orange, and the green foliage lacks saturation.
I'm not deterred. On the positive side, the pictures definitely have a vintage quality to them.
I can think of a couple of things that might be done differently. First of all, these shots were ejected from the camera in very bright conditions. I tried to put the undeveloped film into a dark box as quickly as I could, but there could have been enough exposure to mess up the saturation. The solution might be to get a film shield.
Another factor that I can think of would be the film itself. With a little bit of modification, I could use a newer Color 600 Film. It has a much higher ISO value, which consequently captures much more light.
Monday, July 8, 2019
Polaroid SX-70
I scored another great buy on ShopGoodwill.com last week. Meet the latest addition to my camera family, the Polaroid SX-70:
As you can see from the picture, it's in good cosmetic shape. Even more importantly, though -- and this is the risk you take with Goodwill auctions -- it seems to function perfectly. And something that you probably didn't know: this SLR camera had a 4-element 116mm F/8 lens.
According to a serial number calculator that I found online, my model came from about the third year of production.
The lack of a tripod mount and strap connectors means that this is a Model 1. It has the old split-lens viewfinder that I really love.
The shot below is not exactly a faithful scan -- it's just an iPhone picture:
Also on display is the package of SX-70 color film that I bought from Amazon. It's 160 ASA film and I've read that you really should use it out of doors in bright sunlight. It does have a mount for now-obsolete flash bars, but I don't even want to go there right now.
I've had (much) less than stellar results with previous Polaroid films. I have a couple of Polaroid Spectras, and I ran a couple of packages of Spectra film made by the Impossible Project. Most of the shots were crappy. I suspect that it had a lot to do with the age of the film, however.
The Impossible Project has recently given way to Polaroid Originals, and the improvement in production quality appears to be substantial. Of course, I'm basing all of this on my one test shot. Really, though, my opinion is shared by many other people on the net.
The future brings more experimentation with this camera. I've read that with a minor adjustment and the addition of a neutral density filter you can run the faster and more easily available Polaroid 600 film through it. Now that I know this camera works, I feel safe in trying that out.
As you can see from the picture, it's in good cosmetic shape. Even more importantly, though -- and this is the risk you take with Goodwill auctions -- it seems to function perfectly. And something that you probably didn't know: this SLR camera had a 4-element 116mm F/8 lens.
According to a serial number calculator that I found online, my model came from about the third year of production.
| Serial Number : | 0J501905064 |
| Config : | Hybrid Shutter |
| Model : | Model 1 or Alpha 1 |
| Birthday : | Sep 22, 1975 |
The lack of a tripod mount and strap connectors means that this is a Model 1. It has the old split-lens viewfinder that I really love.
The shot below is not exactly a faithful scan -- it's just an iPhone picture:
Also on display is the package of SX-70 color film that I bought from Amazon. It's 160 ASA film and I've read that you really should use it out of doors in bright sunlight. It does have a mount for now-obsolete flash bars, but I don't even want to go there right now.
I've had (much) less than stellar results with previous Polaroid films. I have a couple of Polaroid Spectras, and I ran a couple of packages of Spectra film made by the Impossible Project. Most of the shots were crappy. I suspect that it had a lot to do with the age of the film, however.
The Impossible Project has recently given way to Polaroid Originals, and the improvement in production quality appears to be substantial. Of course, I'm basing all of this on my one test shot. Really, though, my opinion is shared by many other people on the net.
The future brings more experimentation with this camera. I've read that with a minor adjustment and the addition of a neutral density filter you can run the faster and more easily available Polaroid 600 film through it. Now that I know this camera works, I feel safe in trying that out.
Tuesday, July 2, 2019
More from the "new" old lens
Back on March 29, I raved about the Konica Hexanon AR 50mm f/1.4 lens that I won on a ShopGoodwill.com auction.
I've been using this lens a lot more than I thought I would, getting better at snapping pictures by manually adjusting the ISO, aperture and film speed.
Here's a little gallery of some of my favorite shots:
As you can see, this lens has been performing quite well with close-ups, rendering some pleasing bokeh.
My next challenge is to get better at shooting this lens wide open at f/1.4.
I've been using this lens a lot more than I thought I would, getting better at snapping pictures by manually adjusting the ISO, aperture and film speed.
Here's a little gallery of some of my favorite shots:
As you can see, this lens has been performing quite well with close-ups, rendering some pleasing bokeh.
My next challenge is to get better at shooting this lens wide open at f/1.4.
Thursday, May 23, 2019
Gardener's Bane
For the past six years, I have given up on my vegetable garden. I've been entertaining the notion once again this year, but constant rains have robbed me of the opportunity of roto-tilling. But that's another story. The real story here is the weed that has discouraged me from planting.
This weed has been like a mythological pestilence. When I roto-till, I chop up the roots of this noxious weed and a new plant arises from each piece. Too many to pull -- not that the roots come up with the plant. Too resistant to mulching. And too resistant even to herbicides -- not that I want to use those in my vegetable garden.
I've identified this bane of my existence, and its name is Mugwort.
Here's an encouraging little piece on its prevention, control and management that I found:
Interestingly, mugwort has a long history as an herb. WebMD has this to say:
This weed has been like a mythological pestilence. When I roto-till, I chop up the roots of this noxious weed and a new plant arises from each piece. Too many to pull -- not that the roots come up with the plant. Too resistant to mulching. And too resistant even to herbicides -- not that I want to use those in my vegetable garden.
I've identified this bane of my existence, and its name is Mugwort.
Here's an encouraging little piece on its prevention, control and management that I found:
The dense root system of mugwort can make it difficult to control. Pulling is ineffective, and may even promote growth by leaving residual rhizome fragments in the soil. Mugwort tolerates mowing, and even sustained mowing over two years will not fully eradicate mugwort stands. The relatively shallow roots make mugwort vulnerable to repeated cultivation in agricultural systems, though this practice risks spreading root propagules.Ironically, mugwort was used in the Middle Ages as a magical protective herb. Mugwort was used to repel insects – especially moths – from gardens. This was before roto-tillers.
Interestingly, mugwort has a long history as an herb. WebMD has this to say:
People take mugwort root as a “tonic” and to boost energy.
People take the rest of the plant for stomach and intestinal conditions including colic, diarrhea, constipation, cramps, weak digestion, worm infestations, and persistent vomiting. Mugwort is also used to stimulate gastric juice and bile secretion. It is also used as a liver tonic; to promote circulation; and as a sedative. Other uses include treatment of hysteria, epilepsy, and convulsions in children.
Women take mugwort for irregular periods and other menstrual problems.
In combination with other ingredients, mugwort root is used for mental problems (psychoneuroses), ongoing fatigue and depression (neurasthenia), depression, preoccupation with illness (hypochondria), general irritability, restlessness, trouble sleeping (insomnia), and anxiety.
Some people apply mugwort lotion directly to the skin to relieve itchiness caused by burn scars.Also interesting is the fact that mugwort was a common ingredient in gruit. This was before the "discovery" of hops. Maybe I should return to making beer again. At least my garden would have some use.
Wednesday, May 22, 2019
Pink Ladyslippers
I was looking forward to this time of year (mid-May) because it's when Pink Lady's Slippers orchids (Cypripedium acaule) first make their appearance in our forests.
According to their Wikipedia article, they are widespread in Canada and the eastern third of the United States. Even so, I'd never encountered one until moving to West Virginia.
The following shots were all taken last weekend at Cooper's Rock state forest. All were taken with a Canon 77D and a vintage Canon FD 50mm f/3.5 Macro lens. In other words, manual settings and manual focusing.
According to their Wikipedia article, they are widespread in Canada and the eastern third of the United States. Even so, I'd never encountered one until moving to West Virginia.
The following shots were all taken last weekend at Cooper's Rock state forest. All were taken with a Canon 77D and a vintage Canon FD 50mm f/3.5 Macro lens. In other words, manual settings and manual focusing.
Lady's slippers usually appear in colonies. They are said to prefer pine forests, but I have only seen them in deciduous woods. Lady's slippers have a symbiotic association with a particular fungus. It was thought that the fungus was necessary to provide the plant with nutrients, but recent research indicates that the fungus is only necessary for seed germination.
Labels:
flora,
flowers,
macro photography,
photography,
W.Va.,
wildflowers
Thursday, May 16, 2019
Canon FD 50mm f/3.5 Macro
Some time back, I bought an old Canon FD 50mm f/3.5 Macro lens from ShopGoodWill.com. I've come to like this lens a great deal. Here's a shot of it mounted on a Fotodiox Pro adapter (the blue ring) for Canon EF.
Because of the FD to EF adapter, you need to manually focus this lens, as well as set the proper f-stop.
Once I determined that the light meter in the camera was unreliable for setting these, I've become adept at using the Lux Professional Light Meter app for iOS. This is a great app, by the way. It lets you determine readings based on ISO, f-stop and shutter speed.
Here are a few of the recent pictures that I've taken recently with this lens:
Reviews that I've read about this lens say that it also makes a pretty decent prime lens for regular photography as well as macro. I haven't tried it for this yet.
I got this lens very cheaply with the idea that I would play around with it for a while and then sell it on eBay. Now I'm thinking that this is something that I'd rather hang on to.
Once I determined that the light meter in the camera was unreliable for setting these, I've become adept at using the Lux Professional Light Meter app for iOS. This is a great app, by the way. It lets you determine readings based on ISO, f-stop and shutter speed.
Here are a few of the recent pictures that I've taken recently with this lens:
Reviews that I've read about this lens say that it also makes a pretty decent prime lens for regular photography as well as macro. I haven't tried it for this yet.
I got this lens very cheaply with the idea that I would play around with it for a while and then sell it on eBay. Now I'm thinking that this is something that I'd rather hang on to.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















