Where is the public outrage?
Stephen Pizzo, in his article in the Smirkingchimp.com, likens this latest erosion of our liberties to the classic analogy of a frog sitting in a pot of water that is slowly brought to a boil. It's just going to sit there until it's cooked.Taken by itself, this latest executive order is merely turning up the heat by a few degrees.
Another favorite of mine is Executive Order 13422, which was signed by Bush last January and is now taking effect. This one places a political officer -- a commissar -- into Federal regulatory agencies in order to make sure that newly created regulations will reflect the wishes of the President.
How about another executive order, which states our position on torture in relation to the now-quaint Geneva Convention? It's okay as long as we don't do it with the express purpose of degrading and humiliating.
How about warrantless wiretaps?
So what's a poor legislative branch to do? Cite members of the President's staff for contempt? Guess what -- the Department of Justice, which happens to be under Alberto Gonzales, has said that it won't enforce any contempt citations against all of the President's men.
The heat is on, as Stephen Pizzo suggests.
|Got some time on your hands? Check out this Wikisource listing of all of Bush's executive orders. The first one is a real stroll down memory lane.|
I'm a little lost here. I thought that Congress had to approve any laws or executive orders BEFORE the President signed them? When did he start skipping Go and still collecting $200? Or did they just neglect to mention that in that Political Science class that the govenerment says I had to take to meet general education requirements?
Post a Comment